![]() ![]() I bet that the very next request from some user would be 'not to flush whole playback queue' on playing track from outside the queue while it's being processed. then why don't we just use playlist? Ohh, nevermind, I don't want to start flame war. My point is: if we have queue that looks like playlist, is managed like playlist. I don't want to sound discouraging here, as I believe that great number of users don't agree with core developers and were looking for component such as yours. named 'Party' or 'Queue') using context-menu command. In other words, if you improve your component more and more, what will be the difference between using it, and using simple playlist with 'Remove After Playing' plugin (I remember that such thing existed somewhere)? You can already quickly send tracks to another playlist (eg. I think that is the reason you had to do 'tricks' in your code responsible for changing queue items' order - because the queue is not intended to support such operations. The queue itself was discussed in different (long and boring) topic, and AFAIR core developer(s) stated there that the queue should remain plain and simple. I believe that the queue is not saved by design ( It's Not a Bug, It's a Feature! ). However, I think it outside the scope of this component (?). ![]() Quote from: kerpondile link=msg=648578 date=][quote author=zygzak on 12:53:28 It would be possible to save queue between Foobars2000 sessions? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |